Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Clinical Oncology ; 40(16), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2005645

ABSTRACT

Background: Synchronous video visits (“telehealth”) were rapidly adopted to facilitate provision of cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic, with little time to comprehensively assess patient and provider needs. Attitudes toward telehealth use during active treatment (vs. survivorship care) were largely unknown, as were perceptions of, experiences with, and needed support for telehealth use among older adults with cancer. Older adults in particular may face increased vulnerability to inequities in access to care due to limited digital literacy. Methods: We conducted surveys and semi-structured interviews with providers, staff, and older patients (age ≥60) from a comprehensive cancer center. Data collection occurred between Dec 2020 - Nov 2021. Results: We completed a total of 106 provider/staff surveys, 128 patient surveys, 20 provider/staff interviews, and 15 patient interviews. A majority of surveyed providers/staff felt that telehealth should “definitely be offered” during treatment-phase encounters (55.9% treatment follow-up;69.1% results communication;70.2% discussing treatment side effects). Similarly, most patients indicated they would be willing to have video visits with a member of their care team for: discussing treatment side-effects (73.5%), results communication (69.6%), and treatment follow-up (65.7%). Patients reported experiencing challenges with joining video visits (29%) and understanding the telehealth process (28%). Similarly, less than a third (30.8%) of providers/ staff agreed or strongly agreed that the institution did a good job of preparing patients for their first telehealth encounter. Patients felt the institution should do more to communicate the advantages of telehealth to older adults in handouts and videos, which included: engaging multiple family members in critical appointments (e.g., treatment decisions, end-of-life), seeing their doctor when they were too sick to travel, and reducing potential exposure to infectious disease at the clinic. Participants suggested several strategies to assist patients with limited digital literacy: offering video tutorials of the connection process, creating “fake appointments” to practice online connections, and hiring a digital navigator to assist with technical difficulties and setup of the online portal. Despite challenges, a majority of surveyed patients (65.7%) and providers/staff (76.9%) intend to continue using telehealth after the COVID-19 pandemic passes. Conclusions: Use of telehealth for cancer care was received positively by older patients and providers/staff. Taking targeted steps to enhance implementation could reduce barriers to care, including among older adults and other populations with limited digital literacy, thereby promoting greater equity of access to telehealth benefits beyond the pandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL